California
On March 17, 2026, CSBA stood at the Capitol with three Assembly members and launched four bills in three days. A mandate that the state — not just its districts — be held accountable for student outcomes.
Every one of those mandates requires measurement infrastructure that does not yet exist anywhere in California's education system.
Except at H-EDU.Solutions.
AB 2225 requires competitive procurement by March 1, 2027. The working group must deliver a plan by December 1, 2027.
Legislative Timeline
March 17, 2026
Four bills introduced. Public campaign. State accountability mandate established.
March 1, 2027
Competitive procurement opens for organization to assess governance and close achievement gaps.
December 1, 2027
State Operations and Support Plan delivered. Dashboard, commission, and LAO report frameworks defined.
2028+
Dashboard live. Annual LAO performance assessment. Statewide accountability infrastructure operational.
The Four Bills
Each bill creates specific mandates. Each mandate requires measurement infrastructure. VERA provides the evidentiary foundation for all four.
AB 2225
Establishes working group and competitive procurement. Requires assessment of governance structures and strategies to close pupil academic achievement gaps. Plan must rely on existing statewide data — no new reporting burdens on districts.
AB 2514
Mandates public-facing dashboard showing state performance on closing achievement gaps. Requires visual, accessible, publicly accountable reporting — not aggregates.
AB 2202
Requires verification that interventions funded in district LCAPs actually reach the students they're designed to serve. The missing link between spending and outcomes.
AB 2149
Directs Legislative Analyst's Office to conduct annual performance assessment of state accountability efforts. Requires measurable outcomes, not activity reports.
California's Data Infrastructure
California already collects an extraordinary volume of student data. The state operates ten distinct data systems, updated annually across millions of students.
Individual student records: demographics, EL status, discipline, graduation.
Annual Smarter Balanced ELA and Math scores with claim-level breakdowns.
Speaking, listening, reading, writing scores for English Learners K-12.
Aggregates CALPADS and CAASPP into public accountability indicators.
District three-year plans of goals, actions, services, and expenditures.
Teacher hires, school calendars, classified staff data.
Fiscal, demographic, and performance data from CDE, EdSource, FCMAT.
Links K-12 to higher ed, workforce, financial aid across 11 agencies.
LCFF calculations and fiscal health analysis for every district.
College/career planning linked to transcripts and A-G completion.
Are the state's interventions actually closing the gap for the students who need it most? Every system measures outcomes — what a student scored, whether they graduated. None measures whether the intervention a district funded is reaching the right student, in the right way, at the right time. That is the accountability gap CSBA named. That is what the working group must close.
The Student No System Sees
The child who can speak English but cannot write it at grade level. Not a data point in any state system. No large firm's proposal will name that student, define that gap, or explain why it matters.
VERA uses CAASPP ELA Claim 2 written expression scores and ELPAC speaking scores to compute a district-level oral-written delta that identifies precisely which students have been left behind.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly automating every task that does not require structured written thinking. The student who leaves California's schools without written expression skills is the student who will be sorted out of tomorrow's workforce.
That is not a policy concern. It is a moral emergency.
Why H-EDU
Brian Demsey spent more than two decades serving California's public sector education community through Demsey, Filliger & Associates. The firm served CSBA and more than 400 California public sector entities — school districts, county offices of education, and related agencies — with actuarial services.
That program, built on the GASB 45 and GASB 75 frameworks, is still running today through Foster & Foster following the firm's acquisition. At one time or another, Demsey, Filliger & Associates worked directly with each organization represented on the working group.
The relationships built during those twenty years are not historical. They are current. Trust is not transferable and it cannot be purchased.
The procurement that AB 2225 will open is looking for an organization with experience assessing governance structures, improving strategies to close pupil academic achievement gaps, and working with stakeholders throughout the state.
H-EDU meets every criterion. Not on paper. In practice.
20+
Years
400+
Entities Served
CSBA
Client
The Competition
When the procurement opens in March 2027, McKinsey, Deloitte, Accenture will arrive with polished proposals and timelines measured in years. They will get it wrong for four reasons.
No large firm has spent years working inside California's K-12 data ecosystem. None has mapped CAASPP ELA Claim 2 scores against ELPAC speaking scores. They will spend the first year learning what H-EDU already knows.
Large firms have a structural incentive to propose complex new data infrastructure. AB 2225 explicitly forbids new reporting burdens on districts. They will propose exactly what the bill forbids.
The organizations on the working group collectively represent the people who run California's schools. Many worked directly with Demsey, Filliger & Associates. That relationship does not exist with any large consulting firm.
The Type 4 student is not a data point in any state system. No large firm's proposal will name that student. H-EDU built VERA because of that emergency. No procurement process produces that motivation.
The Platform
The Verification Engine for Results and Accountability is live, built on California's existing public data, producing district-level oral-written delta measurements today. No new data collection. No new burden on districts.
VERA produces the evidentiary foundation for everything the four bills require: the dashboard AB 2514 mandates, the LEA match-rate reports AB 2202 requires, the annual performance assessment AB 2149 directs.
"The legislation has created the conditions. The system is built. The relationships are real. The only question is whether California moves fast enough to seize the moment before it passes."
Better prepared. Already with a solution. With a deeper understanding of what California's students actually need.
Request Briefing